The Invisible Hand That Protects Profits | Quick ₹eads
- Editor

- 2 days ago
- 6 min read
by Karnivesh | 8 January 2026
The $30 Pair of Glasses Worth $300
A pair of glasses costs $30 to manufacture. It retails for $300. That's a 1000% markup.
How is this possible? Because Luxottica controls 80% of the global eyewear market. They own Ray-Ban, Oakley, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and a dozen other brands that look like competitors but aren't.
When you walk into LensCrafters, you think you're choosing between Ray-Ban, Oakley, and Versace. Actually, you're choosing between three Luxottica products. The company controls what's in the store, what's displayed, and what the price is. Consumers have no choice. Luxottica is a price maker, not a price taker.
This is pricing power the ability to raise prices without losing customers. And it's the single most valuable trait a business can have.
What Is Pricing Power?
Pricing Power = The ability to raise prices without losing a proportional amount of volume.
A company with pricing power can raise prices 10% and lose only 2% of customers. The net profit impact is positive (8% more revenue from 98% of customers).
A company without pricing power raises prices 10% and loses 15% of customers. Profit declines.
Here's how it manifests:
Nestlé India wants to raise coffee prices by 10% to offset 75% commodity inflation. The company can do it because coffee drinkers are loyal to Nescafé. They'll pay more. Nestlé has pricing power.
Asian Paints tried to raise prices by 1.2% in Q2 FY25 to offset rising raw material costs. Market share collapsed. Competitor Grasim gained 5% market share in one year with aggressive pricing. Asian Paints lost pricing power.
Luxottica raised eyewear prices by 15% last year. Customers still bought because there are no alternatives. Luxottica has extreme pricing power.

The Pricing Power Spectrum: From Monopolies That Charge 1000% Markups to Commodities That Can't Raise Prices
The difference isn't product quality. It's brand dominance, switching costs, or lack of alternatives.
The Nestlé Story: When Brand Creates Pricing Power
Nestlé India has built pricing power across its portfolio through brand trust and category dominance.
Consider Nescafé instant coffee. Nestlé has sold Nescafé for 50 years in India. Grandmothers grew up drinking it. Mothers serve it. Kids associate it with family mornings.
When Nestlé raises Nescafé prices by 10%, what do coffee drinkers do? Switch to local brands like Café Coffee Day or regional brands? Most don't. The brand loyalty is too deep. Nestlé keeps 92-95% of customers while raising revenue 10%.
This is brand-based pricing power. Consumers are willing to pay a premium because they believe Nescafé is superior (or at least familiar).
Nestlé is leveraging this further through premiumization—launching Nespresso cafes in India, premium coffee pods, and niche products. Premium products have 30-40% price premiums while maintaining healthy volumes.
insight: "Nestlé's pricing power comes from 50 years of building a moat. You can't reverse-engineer it in one year."
The Asian Paints Collapse: When Pricing Power Erodes
Asian Paints is the cautionary tale. For 30+ years, the company had untouchable pricing power.
Asian Paints' advantage was simple: Distribution + Brand + Emotional Connection.
The company had 167,000+ retail points across India the widest network in the industry. Customers bought Asian Paints because it was everywhere and "trusted."
Emotional marketing was brilliant. Ads showed families painting dream homes, weddings, festivals. Buying Asian Paints wasn't just paint. It was buying emotion aspirations, memories, belonging.
With this moat, Asian Paints commanded 20-30% price premiums over local brands. Operating margins hit 18%+.
Then Grasim entered. In one year, Grasim captured 5% market share using aggressive pricing. JSW Paints and Haisha Paints followed.
Suddenly, Asian Paints' pricing power evaporated. The company raised prices only 1.2% in Q2 FY25 far below cost inflation. Why? Because raising prices further would trigger mass volume loss to competitors.
The Result:
Market share fell from 42% to 40.5% in one quarter
Gross margins compressed by 280 basis points
Premium product sales fell 8% while cheaper products grew 15%
Operating margins dropped from 18% to 12%
Pricing power doesn't stay forever. When competition arrives with better offers, pricing power dies fast.
The Luxottica Monopoly: When Vertical Integration Creates Unbreakable Pricing Power
Luxottica is the extreme case of pricing power.
The company doesn't just make eyewear. It controls the entire supply chain:
Manufacturing: Luxottica makes Ray-Ban, Oakley, Persol frames
Lenses: Merged with Essilor (lens manufacturer) to control both
Distribution: Owns LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, Oliver Peoples, Pearle Vision
Licensing: Holds exclusive rights to produce Chanel, Versace, Prada eyewear
Result: When you walk into an optician, 80% of frames on display are Luxottica. You think you're choosing from 20 brands. You're actually choosing from different Luxottica products.
The Pricing Power Play:
Costs to produce: ~$30
Retail price: $300
Markup: 1000%
Competitors like Warby Parker (direct-to-consumer) tried to disrupt with lower prices ($95 frames). But Warby Parker can't scale as fast because it lacks Luxottica's manufacturing scale and retail network.
Operating margins at Luxottica? 17% among the highest in any industry. Not because they're more efficient. Because they can charge whatever they want.
The consultant's view: "Luxottica's pricing power isn't from better product. It's from owning the entire ecosystem. Competitors can't break through."
How to Identify Pricing Power: The Signals
Signal #1: Can the Company Raise Prices Without Losing Volume?
Test: Look at price increases year-over-year. Did prices rise faster than inflation?
Nestlé: Raised prices 3-5% annually while inflation averaged 6-7%. Yet volumes held steady. Pricing power = Strong.
Asian Paints: Raised prices only 1.2% when costs rose 8-10%. Volume still fell. Pricing power = Eroding.
Luxottica: Raised prices 10-15% annually. Volumes unchanged. Pricing power = Extreme.
Signal #2: Operating Margins vs. Competitors
Test: Compare operating margins to industry peers.
Nestlé: 22%+ operating margins. Competitors (ITC, HUL): 16-18%. Margin gap = Pricing power.
Asian Paints: Now 12% margins. Competitors (Grasim): 10-12%. Gap closing = Pricing power eroding.
Luxottica: 17% margins in a 5-7% margin industry. Huge gap = Exceptional pricing power.
Signal #3: Brand Value and Customer Loyalty
Test: Would customers switch if price rose 20%?
Luxury eyewear (Luxottica brands): Customers won't switch. They're buying status.
Nescafé coffee: Long-term customers won't switch.
Generic paint: Customers WILL switch immediately.
Signal #4: Vertical Integration and Control
Test: Does the company control the supply chain or just one node?
Luxottica: Controls manufacturing, lenses, retail, licensing. Pricing power = Extreme.
Nestlé: Controls brand and distribution. Pricing power = High.
Asian Paints: Controls brand and distribution. But competitors can now distribute separately. Pricing power = Deteriorating.
Signal #5: Substitutes Available
Test: How easy is it for customers to switch?
Eyeglasses: Difficult (specific prescription, brand familiarity). Pricing power = High.
Coffee: Easy (many brands available). Pricing power = Medium (mitigated by brand).
Paint: Very easy (all paints look similar). Pricing power = Low (unless strong brand).
The Pricing Power Scorecard
When evaluating a company, ask:
Have prices risen faster than inflation without volume loss? If yes, pricing power exists.
Are operating margins expanding or contracting? Expanding = pricing power strengthening. Contracting = pricing power eroding.
Do customers actively choose this brand or passively accept it? Active choice = pricing power. Passive acceptance = commodity risk.
Are new competitors emerging with lower-priced alternatives? Emerging = pricing power at risk. Like Grasim vs. Asian Paints.
Can the company afford to lose 30% of customers and still be profitable? If yes, it has real pricing power. If no, prices are already at a limit.
The Final Truth
Pricing power is the moat. Not market share, not scale, not technology. Companies with pricing power like Luxottica, Nestlé, and (formerly) Asian Paints can:
Raise prices without losing customers
Maintain high margins even during cost inflation
Fund innovation and growth from internal cash flow
Dominate competitors indefinitely
Companies without pricing power compete on price. They discount to win volume. Margins compress. Innovation suffers. They eventually die.
The investor's job is identifying which companies still have pricing power and which lost it. Asian Paints lost it in 2024-2025 when Grasim entered. Nestlé still has it because brand loyalty runs deep. Luxottica will keep it for decades because no competitor can replicate 80% market control.
That's where the money is in companies you can raise prices on, year after year, without losing customers.




Comments